Romans 8:28 assures IslamicStateCoptsus “that all things work together for good to those who love God, to those who are the called according to His purpose.” and so when I saw the way my Egyptian brothers in Christ were called upon to suffer and die for the name of Jesus, I found consolation in the fact that even this great evil will ultimately be used for good. So with that idea in mind here are some of the ways it seems to me that atrocities like this one could be used by God for good:

1) Because death cannot hurt them, it’s sting having been forever removed by the sacrifice of Jesus (1 Cor. 15:55), all that those evil Jihadists ultimately did was usher those who put their trust in the Lord Jesus into the presence of their Savior. There beyond the veil of death they saw their Savior face to face (1 Cor. 13:12) and heard the words they longed to hear, “Well done, good and faithful servant” (Matt. 5:21). Now they dwell amongst those who “washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb”, who neither “hunger anymore nor thirst anymore” and from whose eyes, God has forever wiped away every tear. (Rev. 7:14,16,17)

I hope that this will have the good effect of reminding the church here in the west not to be afraid to suffer for the sake of Christ, because nothing, not even death by the sword can separate us from the love of Christ:

“Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword? As it is written: “For Your sake we are killed all day long; We are accounted as sheep for the slaughter.” Yet in all these things we are more than conquerors through Him who loved us. For I am persuaded that neither death nor life, nor angels nor principalities nor powers, nor things present nor things to come, nor height nor depth, nor any other created thing, shall be able to separate us from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.” (Romans 8:35-39)

2) Because it starkly illustrates the difference between Islam and Christianity as no theological lecture ever could. Clad In black, we see men with knives in their hands who are about to kill for their god, Allah. Kneeling before them, clad in orange, we see men who are about to die for their Savior, Jesus Christ. One religion is, and has been since its inception, the religion of “Go and Kill” while the other is, and has been since its inception, the religion of “Come and Die”. The founder of one religion decapitated those who disagreed with him by his own hand and instructed his followers to do likewise, “When you meet the unbelievers, strike off their heads, and when you have laid them low, bind your captives firmly…” (Sura 47:4) the founder of the other religion died for those who disagreed with Him, and instructed his followers to “…love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you” (Matt. 5:44)

3) Because it reminds us that suffering for the name of Christ unifies and strengthens the church in ways that nothing else can. In times when the church is not suffering, we are tempted to separate and bicker, and rebuild the walls of separation that divide believers demographically and racially. We forget in those times that in Christ, “there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcised nor uncircumcised, barbarian, Scythian, slave nor free, but Christ is all and in all.” (Col. 3:11) but in moments like the one above, we see as never before that we really are one in Christ suffering together that we might be glorified together (Rom. 8:17) In that picture on the beach they really “are all one in Christ Jesus.” (Gal. 3:28) and therefore all equally “joint heirs with Christ” (Romans 8:17).

4) Because we are reminded that suffering for righteousness sake is a mark of blessing, not a curse and that we should be willing to embrace it, as the Apostles embraced suffering for the sake of Christ (Acts 5:41). It also should remind us that the meaning of the Greek word “Martyr” is actually “witness”. Often the church is prone to forget that the strongest witness to the truth of the Christian is our willingness to patiently endure suffering for the sake of Jesus. Peter’s words regarding persecution in his time are even more true in ours, “But even if you should suffer for righteousness’ sake, you are blessed. “And do not be afraid of their threats, nor be troubled.” But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts, and always be ready to give a defense to everyone who asks you a reason for the hope that is in you, with meekness and fear” (1 Peter 3:14-15)

And these are just the obvious ways that immediately occurred to me that this evil can be used by God for good. There are undoubtedly many, many more. So let’s pray that even as darkness increases, that the gospel light would be seen to shine even more brightly because of it! Read More…

Posted by: Andrew Webb | January 10, 2015

Himmler Proposes a Toast

Meanwhile,Himmler Toast in a drawing room in Berlin in Late September, 1939…

Himmler: “Gentlemen, let us raise our glasses and toast the capture of Warsaw!”
Goering: “And let us not forget the brave pilots of the Luftwaffe who…”
(A staff officer hurriedly enters and whispers in Bormann’s ear for several minutes. An uncomfortable pause ensues.)
Goebbels: “Is something wrong?”
Bormann: “It seems Chamberlain and Daladier are still refusing to declare war.”
Goebbels: “But that is wonderful! It is just as the Fuhrer predicted!”
Bormann: “They have dismissed our successful invasion of Poland, as an ‘incident’ and they say…”
Goering: “What? What do they say?”
Bormann: “They say… That we are ‘lone wolves.’ They say that this has nothing to do with National Socialism!”
Goering: “What? But that’s absurd. Surely they know we were acting on the direct orders of the Fuhrer?”
Goebbels: “Haven’t they read his book? I mean, the invasion of the East is all clearly spelled out in Mein Kampf. How could they miss that?”
Bormann: “I don’t know.”
Himmler: “Surely you’re having us on Bormann? I mean, we’re all wearing National Socialist uniforms and we greet each other with ‘Heil Hitler!’ What could be more obvious than that?”
Goebbels: “And the armbands, what about the armbands? We’ve all got them!”
Goering: “I told the Fuhrer we needed to make the Swastikas on our airplanes bigger…”
Bormann: “I’m just telling you what I’ve heard!”
Himmler: “So what ARE they going to do?”
Bormann: “We are unsure. At present the French and the English are gathering in public places and holding up Kielbasas and signs saying ‘Je suis Pologne.’ Last week they were signing everything they wrote with “‪#‎BringbackourPoles‬.”
Goebbels: “What, all one word? With that tic-tac-toe thingy in front?”
Bormann: “Yes.”
Goering: “You’re kidding.”
Bormann: “No, I swear by the Fuhrer.”
Himmler: “The Pig Dogs! They’re mocking us!”
Goering: “How will this affect the planned invasion of France and the low countries?”
Bormann: “As far as we can tell, it will make it unbelievably easy. We’ve accelerated the schedule and our soldiers report that as long as they don’t have their weapons with them at the time, they can simply walk into their countries. “
Himmler: “Surely not even the subhumans are THAT stupid.
Bormann: “No, apparently they are. Many of them have already gone back to watching football and amusing short films about kittens. We’ve already managed to capture countless neighborhoods in France, Holland, and England and we’ve even put up “Nazi Only” signs in many areas.”
Goering: “Ah, and that must have given away the game, surely?”
Bormann: “No, apparently they are more afraid of being called ‘Naziphobic’ than they are of losing their own freedom.”
Goebbels: “I told you! Didn’t the Fuhrer say they were all cowards who would never go to war with National Socialism?”
Himmler: “Well then! Gentlemen, let us raise our glasses and toast the capture of EUROPE!”

Posted by: Andrew Webb | July 16, 2014

The Picture of a Godly Man

Believe it oGodlymanr not, church-going Christian Men have become a rare commodity. In fact, most American men, whether or not they identify as Christian, do not attend church on a weekly basis. In his book, Why Men Hate Going to Church, David Murrow cites the following sobering statistics:

• Just 35% of the men in the USA attend church weekly
• Women comprise over 60% of the typical adult congregation on any given Sunday
• At least one-fifth of married women regularly worship without their husbands
• The majority of men attend worship services and nothing more
• Men 18-29 are the LEAST LIKELY demographic group to be in church

Why is this happening? Why are men in particular dropping out of church? Murrow, in his book, says the culprit is the feminization of the church, he says evangelicals are making going to church something as inappropriate to the male gender as wearing a pink sweater. But while what Murrow says is true, he’s actually identifying a symptom that exacerbates the problem rather than the cause. Of course we should expect that as men leave the church and women begin to play a more and more dominant role, that churches will become more feminized and that men will react to that feminization by leaving in even greater numbers. But knowing that, while it is helpful, doesn’t tell us what the root of the problem is. We need to ask what caused men to leave evangelical churches in the first place? In my opinion the answer to that question is that in the evangelical world generally, and especially amongst men, if we concentrate on anything theological at all its salvation. When we go to church we are told how to be born again, and usually we are told that we are born again by “asking Jesus to come into our heart.” Then the following week when we attend church we will be told how to be born again, again.
Read More…

Posted by: Andrew Webb | June 13, 2014

Some Thoughts About The Current Moment in World History

We live in an age of transition. Just as the Pax Britannica and the British Empire that had dominated the world stage during the 19th century came to an end in the early years of the 20th century, so too the Pax Americana and the American Empire that dominated the 20th century are coming to an end in the early years of the 21st.

As with the Roman Emthe-decline-and-fall-of-the-roman-empire-700x400-1364317094pire, the signs of the American decline are the same; weighed down by debt and an increasingly worthless currency, the empire sags under the terrible burden of trying to feed an increasingly indolent and decadent population. The bread and circuses that demagogues use to stay in power have to be paid for, so the legions that once kept the peace worldwide are gradually withdrawn from the far-flung borders they once defended and the barbarian advances are no longer seriously contested. Prior alliances and assurances become almost worthless, and stripped of that protection, nations that were once civilized sink into anarchy and darkness. War, rather than peace, becomes the prevailing wind on the frontiers. Other empires, eager to fill the power vacuum left by the American retreat, begin to arise, and people begin to look to powers like Russia and China for support, commerce and protection from the Barbarians. America takes the place that Britain occupied after the Second World War, still classed as a superpower, but no longer really able to act as one, and in reality only the hollow husk of the great nation she once was.

The tides have shifted and are now flowing east. The West, having abandoned the Christian religion that once made it great, is gradually buried by the silt of its own decay. We live now in a civilization lit only by the dying embers of a once bright and shining light. Will those embers be extinguished and the culture be plunged into a darkness that will make this present moment seem like “the good old days?” Or will the Lord be gracious to bring another Great Awakening that will fan the embers into flame once again?

Most of the critiques I’ve seen to date of our session’s post entitled “5 Reasons It Might Be Time to Leave the PCA” seem to misunderstand our points in sections two and four, so I’d like to briefly deal with the most common misunderstandings I’m seeing.

In section 2, “Anarchy in Worship” our objection is not that all worship services in the PCA don’t look exactly the same. Our objection is that as a denomination we no longer follow the teaching of our own Confession in worship, and instead of following the Regulative Principle we have adopted personal preference as the rule and guide for our worship. This means that when it comes to worship, anything goes, and if a session wants to adopt a worship practice that is not taught in scripture, such as intinction, there is nothing to stop them. We are aware that many sessions believe that churches should be free to do whatever they want to in worship, provided it doesn’t violate a command of scripture too explicitly, but we do not believe that this is the teaching of Scripture or our Confessional Standards, and that a quick perusal of some of the better known commentaries on the Westminster Confession of Faith should make that point absolutely clear:

1)  Dr. Robert Shaw, Comments on Chapter 21 of the Westminster Confession of Faith, Section 1

2) Dr. A.A. Hodge, Comments on Chapter 21 of the Westminster Confession of Faith, Sections 1 & 2

In Section 4, “A Failure to Maintain the Teaching of Scripture Regarding Six-Day Creation” our objection is not primarily that views other than the literal six day view were allowed by the PCA’s compromise on Creation, but rather that the one viewpoint that everyone affirmed would never be taught or spread in the PCA, namely theistic evolution, is in fact being taught and spread and nothing is being done to stop it. The evidence for this fact is cited in the article, but here are links you can check out again:

1) Christianity Today, “Evangelical Evolutionists Meet in New York”

2) The Aquila Report, “Metro New York Presbytery (PCA) hosts symposium on ‘Conversations Surrounding the Historicity of Adam”

Posted by: Andrew Webb | May 12, 2014

5 Reasons It Might Be Time to Leave the PCA

1) A Failure to Exercise Discipline: In 2007 several ministers who were known advocates of Federal Vision (FV) theology drew up and signed what they called, “A Joint Federal Vision Profession” in which they tried to make clear what advocates of the Federal Vision affirmed and denied regarding doctrines at the heart of the Christian faith. This profession was signed by ministers from the CREC (which has become well known as an FV friendly denomination) as well as several ministers from the PCA including Jeff Meyers, Mark Horne, Steve Wilkins, and Peter Leithart. The question of whether these ministers were FV advocates had never really been in question, but their signatures on the Profession certainly removed all question regarding their FV beliefs.

Later that year the 35th PCA General Assembly overwhelmingly voted to approve the recommendations of the ad interim study committee on “Federal Vision, New Perspective on Paul, and Auburn Avenue Theologies.” In so doing, the PCA condemned Federal Vision theology as contrary to the Westminster Standards and joined the rest of the NAPARC denominations in publicly declaring that at a number of critical points, including Justification and Sacraments, the Federal Vision was not Confessional, Reformed, or true to the teaching of the Scriptures. Peter Leithart and Steve Wilkins were both quoted in the PCA Ad Interim report as advocates of the Federal Vision and examples of people holding to the opinions being condemned in the report. Read More…

Posted by: Andrew Webb | May 9, 2014

Common Problems In Modern Preaching

Since my conversion in 1993, I’ve listened to a lot of sermons, ancient and modern, reformed and non-reformed, and I’ve noticed that every age in the church has had its own persistent problems in preaching – for instance ancient sermons commonly suffered from the spiritualizing of the meaning of every text, so that in every sermon a fish was never a fish, the moon was never the moon, a child was never a child, and so on. Puritan sermons, on the other hand commonly suffer from the over-reliance on the Ramist method and an overabundance of points and sub-points.

Modern preaching has its own problems, and while there are some commonalities, there are differences between the problems you are likely to see in reformed and non-reformed preaching. Here then are my observations on the common problems in both camps, I should stress this is just my opinion and is not intended to be exhaustive, and yes I’ve been guilty of some of these myself. I offer these lists in the hopes that they might be noted and avoided by preachers in the future!

Primary Problems in Modern Non-Reformed Preaching:

  1. The topical series rules. There is little or no use of lectio continua and hardly any expository preaching.
  2. Lack of solid exegesis. The text is a leaping off point rather than the basis of the sermon.
  3. Scripture is seldom allowed to interpret scripture
  4. Sermons require little or no understanding of the bible on the part of the listener
  5. Emphasis on entertaining or impressing the congregation rather than exhorting them. Often there is actually a twisted symbiotic relationship between the preacher and the audience – he needs their approval and approbation so he tells them things that will provoke those responses. Too many preachers are actually closer to improvisational actors/comedians.
  6. Unwillingness to say anything most Americans don’t already believe
  7. Little or no law and precious little gospel.
  8. Success is measured by how happy the audience was with the sermon rather than how convicted they were or the good fruit it produced. The goal is usually consumerist – success is making the customer happy so that they will continue to buy your product.
  9. The majority of preaching centers on what the people are supposed to be enthusiastic about, but often these days sin (except the sin of judgment) is never discussed so that people are not offended.
  10. As a result what is too often created is not the church, made up of called out, soundly converted, and assembled together saints, but a franchise that can comfortably be frequented by anyone with a spiritual bent.

Primary Problems in Modern Reformed Preaching:

  1. There is far too little emphasis on connecting with the hearers.
  2. Too many of our sermons are actually theological lectures, and our aim is usually to inform the mind rather than melt the heart.
  3. Instead of an emphasis on impressing the audience with our personality via entertainment, our emphasis is on impressing the audience with our erudition via teaching. We want them to go away thinking, “Wow! I never knew that word had such an amazing semantic range in the original Greek. What a teacher our pastor is!”
  4. We tend to make our hearers do too much of the work, and far too many of our sermons are actually unintelligible to non-Christians
  5. We often forget that our preaching should have the same end as John’s telic note in John 20:31 – ” but these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing you may have life in His name.”
  6. We eschew Finney’s idea that conversion is the result of “the right use of means” but are sometimes stunningly unsupernatural in our own view of preaching. Instead of conversion being a supernatural work of the Spirit that must be fervently prayed for, we make it the result of the right understanding of information correctly imparted and received. Small wonder that so many of our listeners can explain theological doctrines but have no clue what Christ was really asking Peter in John 21:15-17.
  7. We often act as though it doesn’t matter how good a communicator the pastor is and don’t see being stunningly boring as a problem. Sometimes we even view being uninteresting as a badge of honor, as though boring was the opposite of ear tickling.
  8. Secretly, we also don’t want to upset our hearers, so the majority of our convicting fire is directed towards the sins found outside the church rather than within it.
  9. Often the majority of our preaching follows the via negativa, we spend our time telling people what we are against, but not what we are for.
  10. As a result what we too often create is “Fortress Church” – a dwindling and unapproachable bastion of the saints –  and then wonder why no one from the world is coming to visit us.

mr-bean-asleepIf you’ve been a Christian for any period of time at all, you may have noticed that the more time you spend in church, the harder it is to fit in and feel comfortable with non-believers or to really enjoy worldly activities, relationships, speech, movies, habits, etc.

So how on earth are you going to make sure that your church attendance doesn’t end up damaging your friendship with the world? How can you make sure that you’ll never seem weird, different, and overly religious to friends, relatives, and coworkers? I mean, you don’t want to be the guy who can stop the telling of a dirty joke just by walking into the room, do you? Well friends, as he has been since the beginning, the deceiver is here to help. He’s prepared this handy list of his top ten tips for minimizing the sanctifying effects of Church attendance. Simply by following these easy-to-do directions you can proudly join the legions of American Christians who have already mastered the fine art of remaining babes in the faith who show little or no sign of growth in what Peter called, “the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.” (2 Peter 3:18)!

1) Try to stay up as late as possible the night before.

If possible, try to drink too much as well. Nothing says “not ready for worship” like a hangover. Read More…

Sun_Red_Giant-390x285One of the things that struck me most profoundly during the Bill Nye/Ken Ham debate last night was Nye’s statement about how belief in a Creator would destroy “the joy of discovery.”

It strikes me that exactly the opposite is true.

As the Christian scientist, like Newton, examines the universe and discovers new things about the creation he is constantly given new reason to wonder and admire the work of the Creator, and confess as David did, gazing in wonder at the stars, “The heavens declare the glory of God; And the firmament shows His handiwork.” (Psalm 19:1) Moreover, he is thrilled that some day he will see the Creator of that handiwork face to face, and have a chance to spend eternity in enjoying the infinitely greater maker of such an amazing creation. With each discovery his desire to find out more about the creation grows, in the same way that someone who has just finished a beautifully written novel in a series can’t wait to start the next one. The idea that someday he will be able to meet and question the author about his work only adds to his delight. Read More…

Posted by: Andrew Webb | February 5, 2014

A Reflection on the Superbowl…

superbowl_rect540 “The attachment many Americans now have to sports teams far exceeds attachment to religious faith—any religious faith.” – Al Mohler

Driving home from church on Sunday Night was eerie, it was a huge contrast to the heavy traffic we normally see as people drive home from restaurants, shopping and work. But on Sunday night, there was hardly any traffic on the road at all.

Where was everyone?

The rows of cars parked outside of houses, the smell of grilling in the air (the first thing people noticed on leaving the church was the heavy barbecue smell) and the glow of big screen TVs told the story. Most of America had gathered to watch the Superbowl, far more in fact than had bothered to attend church that morning.
Read More…

Posted by: Andrew Webb | February 4, 2014

Why Do Christians Worship on Sunday and Not Saturday?

Why do Christian churches meet Covworand worship on Sunday? After all, doesn’t the fourth commandment clearly say “the seventh day is the Sabbath of the LORD your God?” So is Sunday worship just a Christian tradition? Did we not want to get mistaken for Jews? Or perhaps there was a church council that met to decide the day should be moved?

Well no, none of those is the reason that Sunday became the day upon which Christians worship. Sunday worship was not fixed by a church council and as William Perkins points out, “The church, has no power to ordain a Sabbath.” The only authority who can tell us when to worship is the true head of the church, Jesus Christ, and He has done that in His word.

So together let’s take a look at the example of worship in the Apostolic church that we read about in Acts 20:

“But we sailed away from Philippi after the Days of Unleavened Bread, and in five days joined them at Troas, where we stayed seven days. Now on the first day of the week, when the disciples came together to break bread, Paul, ready to depart the next day, spoke to them and continued his message until midnight. There were many lamps in the upper room where they were gathered together. And in a window sat a certain young man named Eutychus, who was sinking into a deep sleep. He was overcome by sleep; and as Paul continued speaking, he fell down from the third story and was taken up dead. 10 But Paul went down, fell on him, and embracing him said, “Do not trouble yourselves, for his life is in him.” Now when he had come up, had broken bread and eaten, and talked a long while, even till daybreak, he departed. And they brought the young man in alive, and they were not a little comforted.” (NKJV Acts 20:6-12)

Read More…

Posted by: Andrew Webb | January 8, 2014

On Family Worship

“Family worship, which Family-Worshipought to be performed by every family, ordinarily morning and evening, consists in prayer, reading the Scriptures, and singing praises. The head of the family, who is to lead in this service, ought to be careful that all the members of his household duly attend; and that none withdraw themselves unnecessarily from any part of family worship; and that all refrain from their common business while the Scriptures are read, and gravely attend to the same, no less than when prayer and praise are offered up.”
(American) Directory for Worship, chap. 15.

Some time ago I gave the following study on the Why, What, How, and When of Family Worship stressing its vital importance for the religious instruction of children. I believe that, along with prayer, there is literally nothing more important you can do for your children than to regularly worship with them at home. Of all the forms of worship (corporate, family, and personal) I believe this is form is the most in need of revival within the American church. Since we are beginning a new year, if you haven’t already done so, I want to recommend you commit yourself to starting the diligent practice of family worship in your own home. I hope this study will help to explain why and how!

Posted by: Andrew Webb | December 31, 2013

Another Year is Dawning


Another year is dawning, Dear Master, let it be,

In working or in waiting, Another year for Thee.

Another year of progress, Another year of praise,

Another year of proving, Thy presence all the days.

- Frances Ridley Havergal (January 1, 1874)

Posted by: Andrew Webb | December 17, 2013

Dear Atheists, Actually it’s NOT a Bronze Age Book


If there is one popular phrase used by atheists to criticize the bible that I’m heartily tired of reading it’s calling the bible a “Bronze Age Book.” There are two reasons I’m tired of it:

1) It’s Grossly Inaccurate: The vast majority of the Old Testament was written during the Iron Age (1200 BC – 500 BC) and the entire New Testament was written in the 1st Century AD and entirely postdates both the periods referred to as the Bronze Age and the Iron Age. If you want to use a snarky chronologically arrogant term to imply you are smarter than the people who preceded you merely because you were born after them, the correct term would be “Ancient Book.”

2) It’s Doesn’t Even Prove What it’s Supposed to Prove: Apart from the foolishness of asserting that people like Moses, Solomon and Aristotle were clearly idiots because they were around a long time ago and didn’t have things like Google, Microwaves, or Cup O’ Noodles, age doesn’t nullify truth or the factual nature of a record any more than the fact that something was generated recently makes it true.

For instance, “I, Rigoberta Menchu,” an autobiography that won Menchu the Nobel Prize, was written in the late 20th century, and became wildly popular and was considered by American academics to be “the gospel truth” about oppression in Central America. Subsequent investigations however revealed that Rigoberta Menchu had made up much of her life story.

In the case of the bible, if the events it records happened, the fact that they were written down a long time ago doesn’t change that factual nature of the record, and to date, every historical event the bible records that can be confirmed by archaeology and other histories has been confirmed.

Posted by: Andrew Webb | December 10, 2013

And You Thought YOUR Pastor Preached Long Sermons!

Very few congregations today can endure a sermon for longer than one hour, and it’s common to hear complaints when a sermon exceeds 45 minutes in length. But it’s worth noting that in the past Reformed Christians regularly endured and even thrived under preaching that lasted for two hours or even longer. For instance, the following is recorded of John Craig, one of the first Presbyterian ministers in Western Virginia:

“Every Sunday morning Jostoneministerstablet1resampledhn Craig walked five miles to the place of worship. In one hand he carried a Bible. In the other hand or upon his shoulder he usually carried a rifle, to be used against Indians if they should make an attack. All the men of his congregation likewise brought rifles. A powder horn was hung from each man’s shoulder by a long strap. At ten o’clock in the morning the people were seated in their accustomed places upon rude benches made of logs and the service began. The minister continued to preach his sermon until noonday. Then for an hour the men, women and children of the congregation sat down in family groups beneath the shade of the great trees and ate their simple midday meal. At one o’clock, the minister resumed the same sermon and continued until after sunset. It was sometimes so late when the sermon was brought to a close that the leader of the congregational singing could scarcely see how to read the last psalm. One of John Craig’s sermons has been handed down in the written form. We may understand how it occupied the attention of the congregation for an entire day, when we learn that it is arranged under fifty-five heads, or divisions.” [Henry Alexander White, Southern Presbyterian Leaders, B.O.T., 2000, pp. 33-34]

One might be tempted to think that Craig was only invited to preach one of these seven hour mega-sermons, but he continued this manner of ministry for many years and it is said of Craig that, “…his heart was always full of tenderness. Multitudes were brought into the kingdom of God through his labors.”

While I wouldn’t personally recommend preaching for over 50 minutes, it should be remembered that at times, long sermons have been greatly used by God. For instance, Acts 20:7-12 tells us that during the Sunday worship of the church at Troas, the Apostle Paul preached until midnight,  paused briefly to raise a young man named Eutychus from the dead who had fallen asleep and out of a third story window, ate a meal and then continued on speaking till daybreak. The total length of Paul’s message was probably around twelve hours in length.

It’s worth keeping these examples in mind the next time you are tempted to call a sermon “too long!”

John ElmergantryBrown of Edinburgh (1784-1853) offers the following sound advice to pastors in his commentary on Galatians. It seems particularly apt in our age of celebrity pastors and evangelists:

“Egotism, or a disposition to bring forward a person’s self, is a characteristic of a weak mind and a contracted heart. It is not an agreeable feature in any man’s character ; but it is peculiarly disagreeable when it is a leading trait in the character of a man who, from the office he fills, should be distinguished by the wide comprehension of his views, and the generous liberality of his affections. Such a man is a minister of the gospel ; and there is something incongruous and disgusting in one whose mind ought to be habitually employed about the glory of the Divine character — the order and stability of the Divine government — the restoration of a ruined world to purity and happiness — the incarnation and sacrifice of the Son of God — the transforming and consoling influence of the Holy Ghost — the joys and the sorrows of eternity — and whose grand business it ought to be to bring these things, in all their reality and importance, before the minds of his fellow-men — it is incongruous and disgusting in such a man to appear primarily anxious to draw men’s attention to himself — seizing every opportunity to bring himself into notice — exhibiting the truths of the gospel chiefly for the purpose of displaying his own talents — calling men’s attention to them more as his opinions than as God’s truth, and less ambitious of honouring the Saviour, and saving those who hear him, than of obtaining for himself the reputation of piety, or learning, or acuteness, or eloquence. This is truly pitiable ; and if angels could weep, it would be at folly like this.

 A minister of the gospel can scarcely, in ordinary circumstances, keep himself too much in the background. He should try to forget himself, and to make his hearers forget him, in his subject. His ambition should be to be a voice proclaiming, ‘ Behold Him ! behold Him !’ attracting no notice itself, but fixing the mind directly and entirely on the subject of the message.”

[John Brown,  AN EXPOSITION OF THE EPISTLE OF PAUL THE APOSTLE TO THE GALATIANS, William Oliphant and Sons, Edinburgh, 1853, pp. 53-54]

 If you’re like me, you get many calls from people seeking assistance. Sometimes they are looking for food, money, rides, or help paying for rent and electricity. The hardest part of this process is is figuring out if you are dealing with one of the many grifters who will contact you, or if you are dealing with the genuine article.

Most pastors already know how frustrating this process can be. No one contacts them and says, “Hi, rather than giving you a bogus hard luck story, I’m just going to tell you straight up that I’m going to use any money you give me to buy Meth or Crack, additionally any food or items you give me will be taken back or sold, and if you pay my rent, it will simply make it possible for me to stay somewhere while I’m scamming other churches and doing drugs.”

So how do you identify the person who is going to abuse your help?

Well here’s a tip that might help. If the person contacting you lives at a motel (as roughly 60% of the people who contact me do), get their name and the name of the motel, then call the motel itself and ask to speak to the manager, explain that you are a pastor who has been asked for assistance and then ask about the person or family who contacted you. They’ll know if they are doing drugs, prostituting themselves, etc. and they’ll also know if they are getting money from other area churches.

Another helpful methodology is to do a Google search on the person’s name, your town name and “arrested” or “charged.” Usually scammers will already have racked up a long string of arrests before they contact you. For instance, just today I was contacted for assistance by a woman whom a Google search revealed had recently been charged with three counts of obtaining property by false pretenses.

Posted by: Andrew Webb | November 8, 2013

Christians, Don’t Become Your Own Minitrue!

In George Orwell’s dystopian novel 1984, the main character, Winston Smith, worked at a government organization called the Ministry of Truth (or “Minitrue” in the “Newspeak” of the novel.) Smith’s job was to revise history to fit thjohn_hurt_1984_ie ever changing needs of the socialist party that ruled the nation. If a former hero or party official was denounced by the party, that person became an “unperson” and Winston Smith erased their good deeds and accomplishments and made sure all prior newspaper accounts and speeches that mentioned them were changed to reflect their new status. The person either ceased to exist or their past deeds became uniformly evil in keeping with their new status. The memories of people like Smith were also expected to change, so that former friends and allies were now remembered as enemies.

 That this kind of radical historical revision actually took place in socialist and communist nations doesn’t surprise most people, but what sometimes surprises me is the level to which everyone – even sincere Christians – can be guilty of operating their own version of 1984’s “Ministry of Truth” in their minds by which they change their memories to conform to their present feelings about individuals or institutions. For instance, in marriage counseling one of the most difficult problems to overcome is what I call the “I can’t remember why I married Hitler” syndrome. A person suffering from this syndrome has usually been deeply hurt by their spouse, and there is a high level of animosity between both of them, in fact they are usually teetering on the brink of divorce. At this point, their own private Minitrue is hard at work justifying their current feelings about that individual by removing any memories of good things, pleasant experiences, positive events and just about anything that doesn’t make the other person seem like a monster. In place of these good memories, every bad thing that ever happened between them is magnified and often times memories that were either good or at least neutral are rewritten so that they become bad and unpleasant. Once a person is suffering from this syndrome it often becomes difficult or even impossible for a counselor or pastor to remind them that they were once head over heels in love with this person and couldn’t stand to be apart from them for even a moment. All they know is that they are married to someone who has always been the spousal equivalent of Adolf Hitler, and they are usually looking for a way to end the nightmare as soon as possible. Read More…

Posted by: Andrew Webb | September 25, 2013

Does Matthew 7:1-5 Forbid All Judging?

Matthew 7:1-5 (NKJV)keep-calm-and-stop-judging-people “Judge not, that you be not judged. For with what judgment you judge, you will be judged; and with the measure you use, it will be measured back to you. And why do you look at the speck in your brother’s eye, but do not consider the plank in your own eye? Or how can you say to your brother, ‘Let me remove the speck from your eye'; and look, a plank is in your own eye? Hypocrite! First remove the plank from your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.”

If you had asked forty years ago for people to tell you what their favorite bible verse was, I’m fairly certain that the most common answer would have been John 3:16, even if they couldn’t recite it from memory. You saw it on T-shirts, license plates, even banners at football games. But today, I’m fairly certain that if you asked the same question, the most popular answer would be Matthew 7:1.

Even if they can’t tell you what the Ten Commandments are, or what the golden rule is, or whether Matthew is located in the Old or New Testament, it seems as though everyone has “Judge not, that you be not judged” memorized, and usually it is brought out whenever anyone points out an obvious sin. For instance, these days, whenever you point out that the bible calls certain sexual behaviors “sins,” it won’t be long before someone is using Matthew 7:1 in such a way that the words of Christ in this verse are actually being used against the words of Christ elsewhere, and scripture is actually being used to silence scripture. Read More…

Posted by: Andrew Webb | September 12, 2013

Is There Any Such Thing As a “Good Lie?”

Christians are called upon to be truthLie of necessity-tellers even when it is to our disadvantage to do so. In fact, being scrupulously truthful should be a mark of a Christian heart. As Dutch Theologian Wilhelmus A’Brakel put it: “If the heart is truthful and loves the truth, it will bring forth truth, and man will be prevented from lying—be it that this is either to our advantage or disadvantage, or that the person is either friendly or hostile toward us.”

 So with that in mind it is easy to see that in most cases deception in order to save yourself or another from danger is not commended in the Bible.

For instance, In Genesis 20 Abraham was fearful that the men of Gerar would see the beauty of his wife Sarah and would kill him and take her, so Abraham persuaded Sarah to lie and say she was his sister. Abimelech the king of Gerar did take Sarah to be his wife, and God himself had to warn Abimelech not to touch her. Following her restoration to Abraham, Abimelech’s “integrity of heart” is commended and Sarah is “rebuked” for lying to him.

However, there are a handful of cases where it could be argued that deceiving an enemy by lying to them was not a violation of the Ninth Commandment, the most famous example being “Rahab’s Lie” in Joshua Chapter 2: Read More…

Why does God allow terrible 911crashevents like 9/11 to happen? Some men contend that He’d like to stop them, but either He is powerless to do so, or that if He did, it would involve a violation of human free will which is supposedly contrary to His nature. But perhaps by looking at what the bible has to say about the greatest injustice in history – the crucifixion of God’s Son Jesus – we can find out how and why God allows terrible events to happen.

After Jesus was sent by Caiaphas the High Priest to Pontius Pilate to be executed (because only the Roman government had the legal authority to put men to death) Pilate, who was personally reluctant to order the execution, asked Jesus a critical question:

10 Then Pilate said to Him, “Are You not speaking to me? Do You not know that I have power to crucify You, and power to release You?”
11 Jesus answered, “You could have no power at all against Me unless it had been given you from above. Therefore the one who delivered Me to you has the greater sin.”
(John 19:10-11)

In his statement to Pilate in verse 11 Jesus corrects Pilate and points out two things, the sovereignty of God and the responsibility of man. This, says Jesus, is happening according to God’s appointment, and yet the sin was still Caiphas’ for delivering Him up to be executed. This idea that the crucifixion was ordained by God, and yet men sinned by carrying it out was also reinforced by Peter in his speech on Pentecost: Read More…

I‘ve often wondered what it would have sounded like if they’d had the modern “missional” celebrity pastors in the early church, and how they would have handled issues like Roman pressure to compromise on the Lordship of Christ or the exclusivity of Christianity. I sense it might have gone something like this:

Archaeologists workinTempusg in Turkey have recently uncovered what they believe to be a 2nd Century fragment from an ancient interview with popular Lycus Valley Presbyter, Elder Lew Dicean, which occurred shortly after the Martyrdom of Polycarp. The fragment is part of a larger scroll, with the Latin Title “TEMPUS” and dated February, 157. Here is what they have translated so far:

T: So what do are your thoughts?

L: What, the Polycarp thing?

T: Yes

L: Well it’s hard to criticize such a well known guy who’d been in ministry for so long, but I can’t get away from thinking, ‘Come on guys, its just a pinch of incense!’ I mean, think about it, we Christians already support the Roman state in so many ways every day. We pay the taxes that go to build those temples, buy the incense, and make the busts of Caesar! And we even use money that has his image on it already. And hey, who doesn’t worship that just a little, right?

I’m looking forward to a juicy steak tonight that my wife cooks so well – mind you I’m not ‘THAT’ guy, I cook too, it’s just not my night – and I know that steak came from a bull sacrificed in the name of Caesar. So aren’t I kind of a hypocrite if I declare Caesar is Lord in the secular realm in all those ways, but refuse to burn a little incense and say three words?

T: But don’t Christians view that as a compromise?

L: Look, all of us, Christian, Pagan, Jew, Zorastrian, whatever, have to compromise our religious faith a little to be good citizens of the empire. It’s the price of citizenship. And let’s face it, NOT burning incense doesn’t get you into heaven. I think in the future, you’re going to see more Christians seeing this as a political and not a religious issue, and attitudes about whether mixing politics and religion has been healthy are definitely changing.

T: So where do you draw the line?

L: Well, not where Polycarp did. I know he had his reasons, but I think there’s this unhealthy fascination with martyrdom amongst some Christians who see Christianity in this very aggressive, confrontational light that just turns modern people off. We need to engage not enrage the culture. One of our guys, Paul, once wrote in one of his letters – and I have this beautiful framed copy at home – “become all things to all men.” To me, that says I must first become a good Roman before I earn the privilege of being able to tell them about Jesus. So for me, the incense is just part of “becoming a Roman” so that I can win Romans. I think in the future you’re to see less of that martyr in your face Christianity that makes enemies and more of the “Compromissional approach” that I favor…

Posted by: Andrew Webb | September 6, 2013

Change of Emphasis at Building Old School Churches!

In the coming months, I’ve decided I’m going to be posting more general theological material which, while it will all come from an Old School Presbyterian (OSP) perspective, is not necessarily specifically about church planting or ecclesiology. This will mean a lot more posts, but far fewer on the subject of church planting and building.

Preaching that dwells on or even mentions the reality of hell and eternal punishment has fallen into disfavor these days, but in his The Doctine of Endless Punishment, Reformed Theologian W.G.T. Shedd pointed out why we must continue to preach on hell regardless of public opinion. Among them we list these three reasons:


1) Just as a ship will not steer clear of rocks that are not marked on a map or warned against with a lighthouse, men will not be zealous to avoid a danger they do not know exists, W.G.T. Shedd therefore counseled, “The kindest way, therefore, for both the preacher and the hearer is, to follow the revealed word of God, and teach the plain and exact truth. Eternal perdition is like any other danger. In order to escape danger, one must believe in it. Disbelief of it is sure destruction. To be forewarned, is to be forearmed. They who foresee an evil, prepare for it and avoid it; but “the simple pass on and are punished.” Speaking generally, those who believe that there is a hell, and intelligently fear it, as they are commanded to do by Christ himself, will escape it; and those who deny that there is a hell, and ridicule it, will fall into it. Hence the minister of Christ must be as plain as Christ, as solemn as Christ, and as tender as Christ, in the announcement of this fearful truth. When he was come near, he beheld the city and wept over it, saying, “If thou hadst known, even thou, at least in this thy day, the things which belong unto thy peace! But now they are hid from thine eyes” (Luke 19:41,42).” Read More…

Posted by: Andrew Webb | April 16, 2013

13 Differences Between the PCA and the PCUSA

I was recently asked to outline some of the major differences between the Presbyterian Church in the USA (PCUSA) and my own denomination the Presbyterian Church in America (PCA) and I came up with the following 13 point list:

1) The PCA does not ordain women to either of the offices in the church (Teaching/Ruling Elder, Deacon). The PCUSA by contrast ordains women to both offices.

2) The PCA affirms that the bible is inerrant and infallible in all that it teaches. The PCUSA does not.

 3) The PCA repudiates abortion and considers it a violation of the sixth commandment. The PCUSA believes, there should be no limits on access to abortions, there should be public funding of abortions, and that there should be limits placed on people who demonstrate against abortion.

 4) The PCA is against homosexual behavior and same sex marriage and believes both are sins. The PCUSA does not consider homosexuality to be a sin, ordains practicing homosexuals and came within 30 votes of giving the go ahead to same sex marriage ceremonies in the church. Their next General Assemby (GA) will probably do so.

 5) The PCA is against divorce except in cases of adultery or desertion. The PCUSA by contrast allows for no-fault divorce and remarriage. Read More…

Posted by: Andrew Webb | November 16, 2012

‎8 Pieces of Advice for Christians Who are Considering Moving

1) Have an eternal perspective when it comes to moving. Follow the example of the Apostolic church and put prayer, preaching, and the fellowship of the saints ahead of career and possessions. That means always being part of a church (ekklesia – assembly of the saints) where you can find all of those things. NEVER put your career or income ahead of your and your family’s spiritual welfare. The Christian life is supposed to attended with hardships, sacrifices, and tribulation. Jesus didn’t say “Do whatever it takes to make sure your brief life here on earth is a comfortable as possible!” He said “If anyone desires to come after Me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow Me.” (Matthew 16:24) Also, don’t be fooled into thinking that a move will fix significant life problems or discontentment. Remember, wherever you go, there YOU are. You bring the problems and the discontent with you. Deal with the problems first, then move.

2) Before moving to a new area, get a map and a compass (the bow kind with a pencil), mark the good churches in the area, then figure out what your maximum reasonable driving distance is, set the compass to that distance via the map legend, and draw a circle around the church. Then look for houses ONLY within those map circles. The closer the better.

3) Visit the churches before you move or at least listen to the sermons. Talk to the pastor and members if at all possible. Remember, you aren’t looking for a congregation where everyone is EXACTLY LIKE YOU, you are looking for a congregation where the members are becoming MORE AND MORE LIKE CHRIST through the means of grace and the work of the Holy Spirit (Romans 8:29, Romans 12:1-2).
Read More…

Posted by: Andrew Webb | October 2, 2012

The Problem with Problems

I wrote the following 11 points a while back as reminders to myself. I meant them to be applied to my own pastoral ministry, but they strike me as equally applicable to everyone:

When your ministry (or life) is full of big, pressing, chronic problems, BEWARE:

1) You may unconsciously make your problems the center and organizing principle of your ministry or even your life, and the first thing you think of in any given situation instead of Christ and the Gospel.

2) You may begin to forget that even the worst of problems “are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us.”

3) You may forget that your problems were ordained before creation by a God who loves you and that all of them will “work together for good to those who love God.”

4) You may start to feel your problems are actually bigger and more important than the problems of other people.

5) You may actually start to believe that people or rearranged circumstances and not faith, perseverance, and above all PRAYER, PRAYER, PRAYER are the answer to your problems.

6) You may start to demand sympathy for your problems and end up making sympathy into an entitlement. If you do that don’t be surprised if after a while people begin to stop giving you genuine sympathy.

7) The very hugeness of problems often makes it impossible to see the equally pressing problems of others, and if you become blind to the needs of others, how can you possibly minister to them?

8) You may focus on the molehill of your temporal problems instead of the mountain of your eternal blessings.

9) You may be tempted to compromise the gospel and your calling in order to pragmatically deal with your problems.

10) You may fall prey to thinking of yourself as a victim instead of more than a conqueror through Him who loved us.

11) You may forget that problems are a God-given necessity, and that “tribulation produces perseverance; and perseverance, character; and character, hope.”

Posted by: Andrew Webb | September 21, 2012

What’s the Problem with our Singing?

While I love Old School Presbyterian worship, there is one part of it that seems to a be a problem wherever you go or whichever congregation you visit, and that’s our singing.

We Reformed  Confessional types do a lot of arguing over what we should sing. Should we sing only psalms, or psalms, hymns and spiritual songs? And even when we’ve agreed on that point, we can still argue over which psalms and hymns should we sing? Old hymns, new hymns, modern praise choruses? Should we sing psalms set to old melodies or psalms set to contemporary arrangements? But regardless of whether the congregation are exclusive psalmodists or contemporary choristers, they tend to both suffer from the same malady -

lackluster and unimpressive singing amongst the congregants.

While the Westminster Confession teaches us in chapter 21 that singing is part of the worship of God, it doesn’t merely say that “mere singing” is to be part of our worship but singing “with grace in the heart” and here many congregations fall short of that mark. In many cases members of the congregation don’t sing at all or when they do, they are merely reading and then speaking the words on the page or overhead, at no point is their heart actually engaged in the process. Often we sing as though we not only don’t believe the things we are singing, but that the things we are singing about aren’t very important. Thus our singing becomes a formality, a tick box that has to be endured before we can move on to the other parts of worship.

Posted by: Andrew Webb | August 28, 2012

Q. Supra or Infralapsarian? A. Neither!

Image For literally years I have been uncomfortable with both the Supralapsarian and the Infralapsarian (or sublapsarian) views of Predestination. I suppose for the sake of those who may be wondering what on earth they are, I should go ahead and define them both before I explain why I don’t subscribe to either view.

Both views concern the logical order of the decrees in the mind of God and seek to answer the question of which decree logically came first, the decree to permit the fall of man or the decree of election and reprobation? The Supralapsarian believes that God determined to glorify Himself via the salvation of certain number of men (the elect) and the damnation of another certain number of men (the reprobate). Therefore he believes the decree of election and reprobation came logically prior to the decree to permit the fall. The men thus chosen were not considered as fallen. The Infralapsarian believes that the decree to permit the fall came first, and that therefore the men thus elected were considered as already fallen and thus chosen from “the perishing mass of humanity.” Read More…

Posted by: Andrew Webb | February 23, 2012

12 Tips For Christian Couples Who Want A Happy Marriage

In ten years of marriage counseling, I’ve noticed certain problems that tend to be present in almost every marriage that is either in trouble or headed for trouble. Here are some tips that if sincerely followed, would eliminate many of those problems and make your marriage more successful and your faith stronger. Some are practical and some are spiritual. I hope they will all be valuable. Read More…

Older Posts »



Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 90 other followers